Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

GLIDE Fellow, Euzebiusz Jamrozik, and colleagues have published a paper in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy discussing (mis-) moralization in public health.

Often linked to health and disease, moralization may sometimes lead to good outcomes yet can often be detrimental to individuals and to society as a whole. It is therefore important to be able to identify when moralization is inappropriate.

The paper explores this through three cases that the authors contend have been mismoralized in public health: one historical example (tuberculosis) and two contemporary examples related to COVID-19 (infection and vaccination status).

The authors offer a systematic normative approach to the evaluation of moralization. They introduce and develop the concept of ‘mismoralization’, which is when moralization is metaethically unjustified. In order to identify mismoralization, the paper argues that one must engage in metaethical analysis of moralization processes while paying close attention to the relevant facts.

The authors conclude by proposing a remedy of de-moralization that begins by identifying mismoralization and proceeds by neutralizing inapt moral content.

Kraaijeveld, S.R., Jamrozik, E. Moralization and Mismoralization in Public Health. Med Health Care and Philos (2022).